Open Question: Does Hillary Clinton owe the survival of her campaign to the Bush tax cuts she claims to deplore?

Now that Hillary Clinton has released her tax records from 2000-2007, we know that she would have paid $8,000,000 more in taxes if the Bush tax cuts never happened. But recent history tells us that Hillary's campaign would have been forced to come to an end... until she injected her campaign with about a $10,000,000 cash loan to keep it afloat. So, does that mean that (ironically enough), Hillary is still in the race ONLY because she had the money that she was able to keep because of the Bush tax cuts? And if she and Bill are so upset about saving an extra $8,000,000 in taxes... why don't they just PAY IT BACK? Just send it in with a note that says, "We really don't need this, use this amount towards the national debt." Heh heh heh. It'll NEVER happen.

Comments are closed.